Safety and Feasibility of Retrograde Recanalization of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients with Need for Repeated Wrist Procedures

Main Article Content

Igor M. Spiroski
Biljana Zafirovska
Sasko Kedev
Zhan Zimbakov
Hristo Pejkov
Darko Kitanoski
Ivan Vasilev
Aleksandar Jovkovski
Hajber Taravari
Marijan Bosev

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of the study was to present a new technique of retrograde recanalization of radial artery (RA) occlusion (RAO) in patients with need for repeated wrist access percutaneous angiographic procedures.


MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 10-year period from March 2011–May 2021, 53 000 patients were referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a high-volume transradial center. RAO on angiography was documented in 1165 patients. Retrograde recanalization of RAO was attempted in 70 patients. The selected patients were with multiple previous bilateral wrist interventions (n = 3–9). Ipsilateral ulnar artery was usually rudimented or occluded and contralateral wrist approach could not be used. We examined clinical and procedure characteristics, access site bleeding and ischemic complications and procedural success of retrograde recanalization of RAO. Visual analog scale (VAS) score forearm pain assessment was performed after procedure. Technique: All patients had palpable pulse distal of previous puncture site due to collaterals from ipsilateral ulnar and interosseous artery. The RA was punctured with an inner metallic needle with a plastic cannula. Using retrograde radial angiography performed by injecting contrast through the plastic cannula, the occluded segment was visualized and crossed with different types of hydrophilic chronic total occlusion guide wires. After sheath insertion, balloon dilatation of the occluded RA segment, successful catheterization, and/or percutaneous coronary intervention was performed. Final RA angiography was performed on all patients.


RESULTS: Successful retrograde opening of RAO was achieved in 65 out of 70 patients (92%). PCI was performed in 56% of patients through the opened RAO and 5 patients underwent CAS. Procedural success through opened RA was achieved in all 65 patients. Forearm pain during procedure was present in all cases (VAS score 3 ± 2.1). Access site bleeding EASY score 3 and 4 occurred in 6 patients (8.5%). One patient had discharge of embolic material up the arm without clinical consequences. In one patient, we observed dissection of the interosseous artery. Clinical and duplex long-term follow-up with a median of 4.1 years showed patent RA in only 20 patients. There were no registered cases of hand ischemia. About 61% of patients underwent subsequent PCIs, through other alternative access sites.


CONCLUSION: Retrograde recanalization of RAO is successful and safe in patients with need of repeated coronary angiography procedures and inability to use other wrist access sites. Puncturing the collateral and performing retrograde radial angiography through the cannula is a key factor in successful opening of the RAO.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Spiroski IM, Zafirovska B, Kedev S, Zimbakov Z, Pejkov H, Kitanoski D, Vasilev I, Jovkovski A, Taravari H, Bosev M. Safety and Feasibility of Retrograde Recanalization of Radial Artery Occlusion in Patients with Need for Repeated Wrist Procedures. SEE J Cardiol [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 25 [cited 2024 Apr. 23];3(1):4-10. Available from: https://seejca.eu/index.php/seejca/article/view/6037
Section
Interventional Cardiology

References

Shroff AR, Gulati R, Drachman DE, Feldman DN, Gilchrist IC, Kaul P, et al. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;95(2):245-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28672 PMid:31880380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28672

Writing Committee Members, Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(2):e21-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006 PMid:34895950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006

Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ ehx393 PMid:28886621

Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, Nolan J, Ludwig J, Tubaro M, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: Position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013;8(11):1242-51. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv8i11a192 PMid:23354100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV8I11A192

Rao SV, Cohen MG, Kandzari DE, Bertrand OF, Gilchrist IC. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: Historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(20):2187-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.039 PMid:20466199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.039

Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): A randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2 PMid:21470671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2

Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: The RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2481-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017 PMid:22858390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017

Valgimigli M, MATRIX investigators. Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program. Am Heart J. 2014;168(6):838-45.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.013 PMid:25458646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2014.08.013

Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Kalpak O, Antov S, Kostov J, Spiroski I, et al. Macedonia: Coronary and structural heart interventions from 2010 to 2015. EuroIntervention. 2017;13(Z):Z47-50. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00827 PMid:28504230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00827

Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Antov S, Kostov J, Spiroski I, Boshev M, et al. Total wrist access for angiography and interventions: Procedural success and access site crossover in a high volume transradial center. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;19(5 Pt B):570-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.009 PMid:29452842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.12.009

Biljana Z, Danica P, Slobodan A, Ivan V, Aleksandar J, Oliver K, et al. Radial artery anomalies in the Macedonian population during transradial angiography procedures. Sanamed Med J. 2016;11(2):87-92. https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed1602087Z DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed1602087Z

Burzotta F, Brancati MF, Trani C, Tommasino A, Porto I, Niccoli G, et al. Impact of radial-to-aorta vascular anatomical variants on risk of failure in trans-radial coronary procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(2):298-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24360 PMid:22431342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24360

Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E, Behan M, Butler R, Hetherington SL, et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart. 2009;95(5):410-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.150474 PMid:18977799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.150474

Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S, Rao S, Bertrand OF, Kwan T. Balloon-assisted tracking: A must-know technique to overcome difficult anatomy during transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(2):211-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24959 PMid:23592578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24959

Mamas MA, George S, Ratib K, Kwok CS, Elkhazin A, Sandhu K, et al. 5-Fr sheathless transradial cardiac catheterization using conventional catheters and balloon assisted tracking; a new approach to downsizing. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(1):28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2016.09.003 PMid:27707595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2016.09.003

Vasilev I, Spiroski IM, Kostov J, Zafirovska B, Jovkovski A, Taravari H, et al. Microcatheter crossing of radial artery loops and tortuosities: New ideas in reducing trans radial approach crossover. South East Eur J Cardiol. 2021;2(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.3889/seejca.2021.6026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/seejca.2021.6026

Zafirovska B, Antov S, Kostov J, Spiroski I, Vasilev I, Jovkovski A, et al. Benefit of routine preprocedural radial artery angiography in STEMI patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;93(1):25-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27711 PMid:30079496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27711

Pancholy SB, Bernat I, Bertrand OF, Patel TM. Prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: The PROPHET-II randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):1992-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020 PMid:27712733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020

Bertrand OF, De Larochelliere R, Rodes-Cabau J, Proulx G, Gleeton O, Nguyen CM, et al. A randomized study comparing same-day home discharge and abciximab bolus only to overnight hospitalization and abciximab bolus and infusion after transradial coronary stent implantation. Circulation. 2006;114(24):2636-43. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.638627 PMid:17145988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.638627

Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, et al. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(3):e088. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-17-00088 PMid:30211382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088

Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu-Fadel MS, Czak SJ, Latif F, Jain SP, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (Radial Artery access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):283-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.036 PMid:25596790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.036

Kedev S, Zafirovska B, Dharma S, Petkoska D. Safety and feasibility of transulnar catheterization when ipsilateral radial access is not available. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83(1):E51-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25123 PMid:23832623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25123

Zafirovska B, Jovkovski A, Vasilev I, Taravari H, Kitanoski D, Petkoska D, et al. Ipsilateral transulnar artery approach catheterizations after failure of the radial approach- Are two sheaths in the same arm safe? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;99(2):411-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29778 PMid:34047429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29778

Mcquillan C, Egred M. Drive-by radial artery re-entry: Extending chronic total occlusion techniques to the peripheral arteries. JACC Case Rep. 2020;2(15):2404-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.09.013 PMid:34317181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.09.013

Mori S, Hirano K, Makino K, Honda Y, Tsutsumi M, Sakamoto Y, et al. Feasibility of ultrasound-guided transoccluded radial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(17):2088-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.035 PMid:32912468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.035

Valsecchi O, Nardin M, Vassileva A, Bernelli C. Transulnar recanalization of a chronic radial artery occlusion. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(7):504-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.04.011 PMid:28600020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.04.011

Achim A, Kákonyi K, Jambrik Z, Olajos D, Nemes A, Bertrand OF, et al. Distal radial artery access for recanalization of radial artery occlusion and repeat intervention: A single center experience. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):6916. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236916 PMid:36498491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236916

Most read articles by the same author(s)